// ===== REFERENCES =====
// [1] duck.ac 用户 **saffah_codex_6s_agg2** 的公开提交 **#105007**
// <https://duck.ac/submission/105007>(本题排行榜 T)。用途:正文基底(逐字节复制)。
// [2] 我方提交 **#105552** <https://duck.ac/submission/105552>(33.012283 ms,本题当前最好件)
// —— 本件与它的**唯一差别**是把 `LAZY FUSED` 定环的 `while (1)` 改成 `while (0)`。
// [3] 方法论:BRIEF §2.18.786("故意 WA 的探针把量买回来")与协调者的"先买上限再写正文"。
// ======================
// ===== 思路 =====
// **试验性提交(提交目的:给"环走批量化"买一个上界,不是求更快解)。**
// 协调者授权我做"每个环顶点的两个环邻居整批算完再按链输出"这一块,前置要求是**先量上限**:
// 若上限 < 331.8 µs(本题严支缺口)就直接归档,不写正文。
// 本件把 `while (1)` 改成 `while (0)` ⇒ **环走一步都不走**(`oa/ob` 停在"不 break 的那条割边"
// 上),**其余指令混合、访存形态、数据全部不变** ⇒ 该点用时之差 = **环走的全部代价** = 批量化
// 能拿到的**上界**(严格说是略偏高的上界,因为跳过后 DFS 拿到的割边不同、其代价会略变)。
// 预期本件在若干测试点上是 WA(割边错)—— 这正是设计目的;若某点恰好得到正确割边,那它反而是
// 一个真实更快的提交(那也说明该点本来就能跳过环走)。
// ================
// 2002 【NOIP2018】旅行(加强版)` 标题行起
// 与 #103441 逐字节相同(md5 = f9990fe6dfe11269de8147b63aee49fb),**只有本发的 A5 一处新增**
// (见思路段;生成器 `t2y_mkv.py` 断言:除 A5 的两处 patch 外零差异)。
// 他文件里原有的英文 References/Approach/Purpose 段已被本头替换,以免同一文件出现两个引用块
// 而只有第一个算数(BRIEF §2.18.557)。本地抓取留档 problems/2002/work/t2k_rival_103441.cpp。
// [2] duck.ac 用户 saffah_codex_6s_agg2 **#102499** <https://duck.ac/submission/102499>
// 与 **#102490** <https://duck.ac/submission/102490>:本件正文的上游世代。
// [3] 上游血统(全部仍逐字节保留在本正文里,均为站上公开提交):
// - saffah_codex_6s_agg2 **#102295 / #102004 / #101969 / #101933 / #101907**
// <https://duck.ac/submission/102295> <https://duck.ac/submission/102004>
// <https://duck.ac/submission/101969> <https://duck.ac/submission/101933>
// <https://duck.ac/submission/101907>
// (分组桶 cache-blocked CSR / 单趟解析 Eu,Ev / 8 字节寄存器式 emit / stke[] 栈帧缓存 /
// backA0 与 chosen 的二分定位 / lazy fused 定环 / 非时序分级输出 / 剥离循环两级前瞻 /
// bsort4 无分支 5 比较交换网络 / l2002_c 下降块前瞻)
// - saffah_cc_v41_260924 **#102355** <https://duck.ac/submission/102355>
// - saffah_cc_v41_agg1(我方)**#102618** <https://duck.ac/submission/102618> /
// **#102382** <https://duck.ac/submission/102382> / **#102342** <https://duck.ac/submission/102342> /
// **#102334** <https://duck.ac/submission/102334> / **#101954** <https://duck.ac/submission/101954>。
// - 我方上一代 best(= 同一正文)**#103491** <https://duck.ac/submission/103491>。
// [4] 我方自己的判题机探针实验(同一题、同族结论,仅作方法引用):
// A64 打包邻接(u64,8 MB 条目)在本工作区被判题机实测 **+18.6%** —— 越过了判题机 6 MB 的 L3
// 临界线(BRIEF §2.18.690 / problems/2002/notes.md §13.4 表 8)。本发是它的**反例修正版**:
// 把条目压到 5 字节(= 40 bit)使足迹 5 MB < 6 MB。该 A64 实验与本节结论均出自本工作区
// (problems/2002/work/t2k_pdrv.cpp、t2k_mkph.py),非外部来源。
// ======================
// ===== 思路 =====
// 本件 = 我方上一代 best(#103491 = 对手 #103441 正文逐字节)**只叠一刀 A5**。
//
// 【A5 是什么】把邻接表从 4 字节标签数组换成 **5 字节打包条目**:
// A5[c] = label(19 bit) | start(label)(20 bit) | last(1 bit) = 40 bit = 5 byte
// - 2m = 1e6 条目 × 5 B = **5 MB**(judge L3 = 6 MB ⇒ 进得去;u64 版 = 8 MB ⇒ 进不去)
// - last = "本条目是其属主邻接表的最后一条"(构建时按 `start[u+1]-1` 打一位标记)
//
// 【为什么】判题机相位账:DFS 占 **49%**(tc19 家族),而 DFS 每顶点要两次**依赖**随机读
// `start[v] -> adj[start[v]]`(各 ~42 拍 L3 命中,119 拍/顶点,其中 ~84 拍是这条链)。
// A5 让"孩子自己的 start"**随父节点的扫描条目一起到达**(扫描是顺序的),于是:
// ① 每顶点只剩 **一次**依赖随机读(A5[start[v]]),且它的地址在本轮就已确定 ⇒ 可以提前
// 一整个迭代发出 `prefetch(&A5[sv])` —— 这正是 l2002_c 做不到的(它的目标是
// `adj[start[v]]`,必须等一个在飞的 load 落地,领先量≈0)。
// ② `last` 位**取代了帧里的 end 上界**(stke[])⇒ 每次 push 少一个 store、每轮少一个 load、
// 且 `deg[v]==1`(V2 刀)变成"v 的首条目带 last 位"这**一次同线读**。
//
// 【判题机定价】`problems/2002/work/t2y_pdrv.cpp`(同二进制 4 臂、臂序随 rep 轮转、丢弃 rep0、
// 取 min、每 (形状,臂) 打 FNV checksum 闸门),shape = ring/2 + 随机森林(m=n,n=5e5,
// 即 tc19 家族),单位 TSC ticks:
// A = 119004728 A2 = 118249164 **X(A5) = 116617530** S = 122011548
// ⇒ A5 相对 A **−2.00%**、相对同码对照 A2 **−1.38%**(A/A2 自身带宽 0.64%);
// S(阳性对照:删掉 l2002_c 预取)**+2.53%**,与该项目历史正式提交的 +2.8% 同号同量级
// ⇒ 仪器有分辨力(BRIEF §2.18.514①)。
// 四臂 checksum **逐位相同**(b0ac7874df4ef84e)⇒ 纯查表结构改动,遍历序列未变。
//
// 【语义等价性(论证 + 闸门)】A5 只改"标签/表首/表尾从哪里读":
// - last 位 = 属主表的最后一条(构建时由 CSR 边界 `start[u+1]-1` 打标,与 deg[] 无关 ⇒
// 不依赖被 peel 破坏后的 deg[]);
// - 帧的游标用哨兵 0xFFFFFFFF 表示"该表已走完",与旧的 `c < e` 同义;
// - 跳过父边/割边 (cu,cv) 的判定、emit 顺序、V2(度-1 直出) 语义逐条照搬。
// 闸门:`t2y_pdrv.cpp` 四个形状(cyc / rtree / ring+tree / path,n=5e4)与 ring+tree(n=5e5)
// 上 **A / A2 / X / S 四臂输出逐字节相同**(0 fail)。
//
// 【本发的范围】只改 **m == n 分支**的 DFS(T 点 tc19 所在家族);m == n-1 分支一行未动
// (判题机相位账里该家族不决定 T)。A5 的构建趟与 DFS 改写都只在 m == n 路径上执行。
//
// 【下一步 / 未量】① 构建趟的 flag 第二趟可并进第一趟(省 ~n 次散写,待量);
// ② m == n-1 分支同理可改(对 tc9-12 有用,对 T 无用);③ A5 首条目预取距离可扫。
// ================
// 2002 【NOIP2018】旅行(加强版)` 标题行起
// 与 #103441 **逐字节相同**(md5 = f9990fe6dfe11269de8147b63aee49fb,生成器内 assert)。
// 他文件里原有的英文 References/Approach/Purpose 段已被本头替换,以免同一文件出现两个引用块
// 而只有第一个算数(BRIEF §2.18.557)。本地抓取留档 problems/2002/work/t2k_rival_103441.cpp。
// 他的这一代相对我方 #102618 只有两处新东西(方法:`tools/fnmd5.py` 逐函数 md5 + 全量正文 diff,
// 再做一次**去注释后正文逐字节比对**,两者一致):**`D3W[1000]` 三位查表 emit(2 除法→1 除法、
// 3 次查表→2 次查表)** 与 **`bsort` 的 `len==2` 特化**。其余全部逐字节继承。
// [2] duck.ac 用户 saffah_codex_6s_agg2 **#102499** <https://duck.ac/submission/102499>
// 与 **#102490** <https://duck.ac/submission/102490>:本件正文的上游世代(他的 #103441 自述
// [1]=他自己的 #102699,而 #102699 自述整份复制自我方 #102618)。
// [3] 上游血统(全部仍逐字节保留在本正文里,均为站上公开提交):
// - saffah_codex_6s_agg2 **#102295 / #102004 / #101969 / #101933 / #101907**
// <https://duck.ac/submission/102295> <https://duck.ac/submission/102004>
// <https://duck.ac/submission/101969> <https://duck.ac/submission/101933>
// <https://duck.ac/submission/101907>
// (分组桶 cache-blocked CSR / 单趟解析 Eu,Ev / 8 字节寄存器式 emit / stke[] 栈帧缓存 /
// backA0 与 chosen 的二分定位 / lazy fused 定环 / 非时序分级输出 / 剥离循环两级前瞻 /
// bsort4 无分支 5 比较交换网络 / l2002_c 下降块前瞻)
// - saffah_cc_v41_260924 **#102355** <https://duck.ac/submission/102355>
// - saffah_cc_v41_agg1(我方)**#102618** <https://duck.ac/submission/102618>(上一代 best)/
// **#102382** <https://duck.ac/submission/102382>(parse 相位 deg[] 随机 RMW 分组化)/
// **#102342** <https://duck.ac/submission/102342>(两处 __builtin_expect)/
// **#102334** <https://duck.ac/submission/102334>(emit 六位数快路径)/
// **#101954** <https://duck.ac/submission/101954>(V2:DFS 度-1 直出)。
// 组合关系与逐代 diff 已在 problems/2002/notes.md 第八~十二节逐条留档。
// ======================
// ===== 思路 =====
// 本件 = **#103441 正文逐字节复刻**(复刻无罚项,BRIEF §2.18.653:他的正文本身是我方 #102618 的后代,
// 判题机编译的是同一份源码 ⇒ 布局抽签相同),**只叠一刀**:
// K10(我方上一轮已备好、未提交):把割边 (cu,cv) 的三路判定 **hoist 出 m==n 的 DFS 候选扫描循环**。
// 原式 `if (v == pu || (u == cu && v == cv) || (u == cv && v == cu)) c++;`
// 逐候选 3 个比较 + 2 个 `u ==` 的短路径;而**只有 cu 与 cv 这两个顶点**可能有"禁子"
// (割边必有一端是当前顶点),其余 n−2 个顶点的判定退化为**一次 `adj[c] == pu`**。
// 这是 §12.2 判定的**唯一能赢的那一类**:热循环里**减指令**(不是加预取、不是改除法形式)。
// 这是一发"补基座 + 单刀"打包:v1 的 Δ 里 −99% 是基座代差(34.207 → 33.781),K10 是唯一新变量。
// ================
// 2002 【NOIP2018】旅行(加强版) v2: cache-blocked CSR + fast io
#include <emmintrin.h>
#ifdef LOCAL_TEST
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstring>
typedef unsigned long u64;
static char g_in[48 << 20];
static char g_out[48 << 20];
#else
typedef unsigned long u64;
#endif
typedef unsigned int u32;
static int g_nosort = 1; // ABLATION probe: 1 = skip the per-list sort (WA)
#define MAXN 500005
#define MAXE 1000005
#define LOG2G 12
#define GSIZE (1 << LOG2G)
#define GMASK (GSIZE - 1)
#define MAXG ((MAXN / GSIZE) + 2)
static u32 deg[MAXN];
static u32 start[MAXN + 2];
static u32 adj[MAXE];
union Y2BU {
struct { u32 TT[MAXE]; u32 EEu[MAXE]; u32 EEv[MAXE]; } s;
unsigned char A5B_[5 * MAXE + 64];
};
static union Y2BU YU;
#define T YU.s.TT
#define Eu YU.s.EEu
#define Ev YU.s.EEv
#define A5B YU.A5B_
static u32 SC[MAXN + 2];
static u32 gpos[MAXG];
static u32 gcnt[MAXG], gcur[MAXG];
static u32 DV[MAXN];
static u32 par[MAXN];
static u32 STK[3 * MAXN];
#define stk (STK)
#define stkc (STK + MAXN)
#define stke (STK + 2 * MAXN)
static u32 qq[MAXN + 32]; // +16 so the peel's lookahead read stays in bounds
static u32 vs[MAXN];
static unsigned char vis[MAXN];
static const char D2[] =
"00010203040506070809"
"10111213141516171819"
"20212223242526272829"
"30313233343536373839"
"40414243444546474849"
"50515253545556575859"
"60616263646566676869"
"70717273747576777879"
"80818283848586878889"
"90919293949596979899";
#ifdef LOCAL_TEST
static const unsigned char *ip_, *ie_;
static char *op_;
#else
struct DI {
u64 abi;
const char *s; u64 sn;
char *o; u64 ol; u64 os;
char *e; u64 el; u64 es;
const char *IB; u64 IBl;
char *OB; u64 OBl;
u64 tsc;
} __attribute__((packed));
static DI *D;
static const unsigned char *ip_, *ie_;
static char *op_;
#endif
static inline u32 ni() {
const unsigned char *p = ip_;
while (*p <= ' ') p++;
u32 v = (u32)(*p++ - '0');
while (*p > ' ') v = v * 10 + (u32)(*p++ - '0');
ip_ = p;
return v;
}
static unsigned short D2W[100];
static u32 D3W[1000];
static inline void initD2W(void) {
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) D2W[i] = (unsigned short)((unsigned char)D2[i*2] | ((unsigned char)D2[i*2+1] << 8));
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) D3W[i] = (u32)('0' + i / 100) | ((u32)D2W[i % 100] << 8);
}
// v <= 999999 (bounded by n <= 500000). Builds the 6 digit bytes + a trailing space
// entirely in a register and emits them with ONE unaligned 8-byte store, instead of the
// shipped reverse-into-then-copy-byte-by-byte form. Verified byte-identical to the
// shipped formatter for every v in 1..600000; measured 3.03x faster (20.68 -> 6.83 ns/num).
// ---- non-temporal staged output -------------------------------------------
// The 3.4 MB output used to stream through L3 with an RFO read per line, and L3 is
// exactly the size of the DFS's working set (adj 4 MB + start 2 MB). Staging the emit
// in an L1-resident buffer and flushing it with movntdq drops both the RFO traffic and
// the eviction. A measured probe that only removed the streaming (keeping the whole
// formatter) was worth -0.85 ms on the k=250k shape, -0.70 pure cycle, -0.17 tree.
static char sbuf[8192 + 128];
static char *ofp;
static u32 soff = 0;
static void oflush(void) {
if (soff < 32u) return;
if ((size_t)ofp & 31u) { // one-off 32-byte alignment prologue
u32 pad = 32u - (u32)((size_t)ofp & 31u);
if (pad > soff) return;
__builtin_memcpy(ofp, sbuf, pad);
ofp += pad; soff -= pad;
__builtin_memmove(sbuf, sbuf + pad, soff);
}
u32 n = soff & ~31u;
for (u32 i = 0; i < n; i += 32) {
__m128i x = _mm_loadu_si128((const __m128i *)(sbuf + i));
__m128i y = _mm_loadu_si128((const __m128i *)(sbuf + i + 16));
_mm_stream_si128((__m128i *)(ofp + i), x);
_mm_stream_si128((__m128i *)(ofp + i + 16), y);
}
ofp += n; soff -= n;
if (soff) __builtin_memmove(sbuf, sbuf + n, soff);
}
static void oflushall(void) {
oflush();
if (soff) { __builtin_memcpy(ofp, sbuf, soff); ofp += soff; soff = 0; }
_mm_sfence();
op_ = ofp;
}
static __attribute__((always_inline)) inline void emit(u32 v) {
u32 hi3 = v / 1000u, lo3 = v - hi3 * 1000u;
u64 w = (u64)D3W[hi3] | ((u64)D3W[lo3] << 24) | ((u64)0x20u << 48);
u32 kk = (u32)(v < 100000u) + (u32)(v < 10000u) + (u32)(v < 1000u)
+ (u32)(v < 100u) + (u32)(v < 10u);
if (__builtin_expect(v >= 100000u, 1)) { // 6 digits: kk == 0 -> z == w, advance is exactly 7
__builtin_memcpy(sbuf + soff, &w, 8);
soff += 7u;
if (__builtin_expect(soff >= 8192u, 0)) oflush();
return;
}
u64 z = w >> (8u * kk);
__builtin_memcpy(sbuf + soff, &z, 8);
soff += 7u - kk;
if (__builtin_expect(soff >= 8192u, 0)) oflush();
}
// The radix path is what stopped gcc inlining bsort, so EVERY one of the n call sites
// paid a real call+return -- and half of them (deg==1) return immediately. Split it:
// the small path is force-inlined (it is ~20 instructions) and only the rare long-list
// case goes through a call.
static __attribute__((noinline)) void bsort_big(u32 *a, u32 len) {
// LSD radix, 3 passes of 8 bits (values < 2^20)
static u32 scr[MAXE];
u32 *src = a, *dst = scr;
for (u32 sh = 0; sh < 24; sh += 8) {
u32 cnt[256];
for (u32 i = 0; i < 256; i++) cnt[i] = 0;
for (u32 i = 0; i < len; i++) cnt[(src[i] >> sh) & 255]++;
u32 s = 0;
for (u32 i = 0; i < 256; i++) { u32 c = cnt[i]; cnt[i] = s; s += c; }
for (u32 i = 0; i < len; i++) { u32 b = (src[i] >> sh) & 255; dst[cnt[b]++] = src[i]; }
u32 *t = src; src = dst; dst = t;
}
if (src != a) for (u32 i = 0; i < len; i++) a[i] = src[i];
}
/* ARM c5 (lane l2002_lane_b2): BRANCHLESS SMALL-LIST NETWORK.
The corrected ladder prices `bsort + DV + qq seed` at 5 873 us (harness, k=250000) and a
BOARD ablation of the sort alone at 1.822 ms (sid 102290, WA, 39.425 -> 37.603 ms) -- 4x the
gap. The work is NOT the comparisons (a random recursive tree is ~50 % deg-1 and ~25 %
deg-2, so the genuine sort work is ~1 op per list): it is the insertion sort's
`for (i = 1; i < len; i++)` exit branch, whose trip count is a random 1..6 and therefore
mispredicts on the hot per-vertex path. For 2 <= len <= 4 this replaces the loop with a
FIXED 5-compare-exchange network on register-resident values, padded with a 0xFFFFFFFF
sentinel and written back with masked (cmov) stores, so nothing outside [a, a+len) is
touched. Branch-free, no loop, fixed cost. */
#define NRM_CE(X, Y) do { u32 _x = (X), _y = (Y); u32 _l = _x < _y ? _x : _y; u32 _h = _x < _y ? _y : _x; (X) = _l; (Y) = _h; } while (0)
static __attribute__((always_inline)) inline void bsort4(u32 *a, u32 len) {
u32 x0 = a[0];
u32 x1 = len > 1 ? a[1] : 0xFFFFFFFFu;
u32 x2 = len > 2 ? a[2] : 0xFFFFFFFFu;
u32 x3 = len > 3 ? a[3] : 0xFFFFFFFFu;
NRM_CE(x0, x1); NRM_CE(x2, x3); NRM_CE(x0, x2); NRM_CE(x1, x3); NRM_CE(x1, x2);
a[0] = x0;
if (len > 1) a[1] = x1;
if (len > 2) a[2] = x2;
if (len > 3) a[3] = x3;
}
static __attribute__((always_inline)) inline void bsort(u32 *a, u32 len) {
if (len < 2) return;
if (len == 2) {
u32 x = a[0], y = a[1];
a[0] = x < y ? x : y;
a[1] = x < y ? y : x;
return;
}
if (len <= 4) { bsort4(a, len); return; }
if (len <= 24) {
for (u32 i = 1; i < len; i++) {
u32 x = a[i], j = i;
while (j && a[j - 1] > x) { a[j] = a[j - 1]; j--; }
a[j] = x;
}
return;
}
bsort_big(a, len);
}
static __attribute__((noinline)) void y2b_a5_dfs(u32 n, u32 m, u32 cu, u32 cv) {
for (u32 cc = 0; cc < (m << 1); cc++) {
u32 w = adj[cc];
u32 st = start[w];
unsigned char *pp = A5B + (size_t)cc * 5;
*(u32 *)pp = w | (st << 19);
pp[4] = (unsigned char)(st >> 13);
}
for (u32 uu = 1; uu <= n; uu++) if (start[uu + 1] > start[uu]) A5B[((size_t)(start[uu + 1] - 1)) * 5 + 4] |= 0x80;
u32 sp = 0;
ofp = op_;
stk[sp] = 1; stkc[sp] = start[1]; stke[sp] = start[2]; sp++;
emit(1);
while (sp) {
u32 u = stk[sp - 1];
u32 c = stkc[sp - 1];
u32 pu = sp >= 2 ? stk[sp - 2] : 0;
// A5: 每顶点一次依赖随机读。孩子自己的 start 随父表条目一起到达(扫描是顺序的),
// 且它的地址在本轮确定 => 可以提前一整个迭代预取。stke[](end 上界)由 last 位取代。
u32 v = 0, sv = 0, last = 0;
for (;;) {
if (c == 0xFFFFFFFFu) break; // 该表已走完(与旧的 c >= e 同义)
unsigned long long yx = *(const unsigned long long *)(A5B + (size_t)c * 5);
u32 x = (u32)(yx & 524287u);
last = (u32)((yx >> 39) & 1u);
if (!(x == pu || (u == cu && x == cv) || (u == cv && x == cu))) {
v = x; sv = (u32)((yx >> 19) & 1048575u); break;
}
if (last) { c = 0xFFFFFFFFu; break; } // 跳过的那条正是本表最后一条
c++;
}
if (v) {
stkc[sp - 1] = last ? 0xFFFFFFFFu : c + 1; // 父帧游标;哨兵 = 该表已空
__builtin_prefetch(A5B + (size_t)sv * 5);
emit(v);
// V2: deg[v]==1 <=> v 自己表的首条目就是最后一条(同线一次读,取代 sv1-sv==1)
if (*(const unsigned long long *)(A5B + (size_t)sv * 5) & (1ull << 39)) continue;
stk[sp] = v; stkc[sp] = sv; sp++;
} else sp--;
}
oflushall();
}
static void main_solve() {
static int _d2w = 0; if (!_d2w) { _d2w = 1; initD2W(); }
u32 n = ni(), m = ni();
if (n == 0) n = 1;
const unsigned char *hdr = ip_;
// ---- grouped degree count: the RMW lands on 123 L1-resident counters, not on the 2 MB deg[] ----
for (u32 i = 0; i < m; i++) {
u32 u = ni(), v = ni();
// NOTE: the group index is taken from the 0-BASED label, exactly as the shipped
// T[] scatter does (u = Eu[i] = label-1, then gpos[u >> LOG2G]++). Using the raw
// 1-based label here shifts every vertex whose label is 1 (mod 4096) into the next
// group -- the 54-shape gate caught it as 9/54 fail.
gcnt[(u - 1) >> LOG2G]++; gcnt[(v - 1) >> LOG2G]++;
Eu[i] = u - 1; Ev[i] = v - 1;
}
// group buckets: group g covers vertices [g*GSIZE+1, min(n, (g+1)*GSIZE)]
u32 G = ((n - 1) >> LOG2G) + 1;
{
u32 s = 0;
for (u32 g = 0; g < G; g++) { gpos[g] = s; gcur[g] = s; s += gcnt[g]; }
gpos[G] = s; // == 2m == old start[n+1]
}
// parse again, scatter directed edges into group buckets (same buckets, same order)
for (u32 i = 0; i < m; i++) {
u32 u = Eu[i], v = Ev[i];
T[gcur[u >> LOG2G]++] = (u32)((u & GMASK) << 20) | (v + 1);
T[gcur[v >> LOG2G]++] = (u32)((v & GMASK) << 20) | (u + 1);
}
// per-group: rebuild deg[] inside the 16 KB window, prefix-sum it, scatter. deg[] ends
// bit-identical to what the old pass-1 RMW produced (the sort loop and the peel read it).
u32 carry = 0;
for (u32 g = 0; g < G; g++) {
u32 base = (g << LOG2G) + 1;
u32 hi = base + GSIZE;
if (hi > n + 1) hi = n + 1;
u32 lo = gpos[g], e = gpos[g + 1];
for (u32 t = lo; t < e; t++) {
u32 x = T[t];
deg[base + (x >> 20)]++;
}
u32 s = carry;
for (u32 u = base; u < hi; u++) { u32 d = deg[u]; start[u] = s; SC[u] = s; s += d; }
carry = s;
for (u32 t = lo; t < e; t++) {
u32 x = T[t];
u32 u = base + (x >> 20);
adj[SC[u]++] = x & 0xFFFFF;
}
}
start[n + 1] = carry;
// sort each adjacency list (fused: the ring case also seeds DV[] and the leaf queue here,
// so deg[] is read once instead of twice and the separate init pass disappears)
u32 qh = 0, qt = 0;
if (m == n - 1) {
if (g_nosort) {
u32 b = 0; // start[1]=0 and start[u+1]=start[u]+deg[u]
for (u32 u = 1; u <= n; u++) { u32 d = deg[u]; bsort(adj + b, d); b += d; }
}
} else {
// deg[] is ALSO the peel's DV[] (see below). The list base is a RUNNING SUM of deg[]
// (start[1]=0, start[u+1]=start[u]+deg[u]), so start[] is never re-read here: the shipped
// loop streamed a full extra 2 MB of start[] to obtain a value it was already holding.
// deg[] is DEAD from the moment this loop ends (the only later readers of a degree
// are the peel, and the peel destroys it) -- so DV[] is not a second array at all.
// The shipped code copied deg[] into DV[] : a full n-vertex 2 MB write for nothing.
if (g_nosort) {
u32 b = 0;
for (u32 u = 1; u <= n; u++) {
u32 d = deg[u];
bsort(adj + b, d);
b += d;
if (d == 1) qq[qt++] = u;
}
}
}
if (m == n - 1) {
// A5 for the TREE branch, INLINED (not called): keeping the block in place keeps
// main_solve's code shape close to the version without it, so the m==n path's layout
// (and therefore tc19) is disturbed much less. cu = cv = 0 makes the cut test
// identically false for every u >= 1, so this IS the tree DFS.
u32 cu = 0, cv = 0;
for (u32 cc = 0; cc < (m << 1); cc++) {
u32 w = adj[cc];
u32 st = start[w];
unsigned char *pp = A5B + (size_t)cc * 5;
*(u32 *)pp = w | (st << 19);
pp[4] = (unsigned char)(st >> 13);
}
for (u32 uu = 1; uu <= n; uu++) if (start[uu + 1] > start[uu]) A5B[((size_t)(start[uu + 1] - 1)) * 5 + 4] |= 0x80;
u32 sp = 0;
ofp = op_;
stk[sp] = 1; stkc[sp] = start[1]; stke[sp] = start[2]; sp++;
emit(1);
while (sp) {
u32 u = stk[sp - 1];
u32 c = stkc[sp - 1];
u32 pu = sp >= 2 ? stk[sp - 2] : 0;
// A5: 每顶点一次依赖随机读。孩子自己的 start 随父表条目一起到达(扫描是顺序的),
// 且它的地址在本轮确定 => 可以提前一整个迭代预取。stke[](end 上界)由 last 位取代。
u32 v = 0, sv = 0, last = 0;
for (;;) {
if (c == 0xFFFFFFFFu) break; // 该表已走完(与旧的 c >= e 同义)
unsigned long long yx = *(const unsigned long long *)(A5B + (size_t)c * 5);
u32 x = (u32)(yx & 524287u);
last = (u32)((yx >> 39) & 1u);
if (!(x == pu || (u == cu && x == cv) || (u == cv && x == cu))) {
v = x; sv = (u32)((yx >> 19) & 1048575u); break;
}
if (last) { c = 0xFFFFFFFFu; break; } // 跳过的那条正是本表最后一条
c++;
}
if (v) {
stkc[sp - 1] = last ? 0xFFFFFFFFu : c + 1; // 父帧游标;哨兵 = 该表已空
__builtin_prefetch(A5B + (size_t)sv * 5);
emit(v);
// V2: deg[v]==1 <=> v 自己表的首条目就是最后一条(同线一次读,取代 sv1-sv==1)
if (*(const unsigned long long *)(A5B + (size_t)sv * 5) & (1ull << 39)) continue;
stk[sp] = v; stkc[sp] = sv; sp++;
} else sp--;
}
oflushall();
return;
}
// ---- m == n : base ring tree ----
while (qh < qt) {
u32 u = qq[qh++];
// Hide the random start[u] miss: issue it 16 pops early. qq[] is sequential, so this
// read is nearly free, and qq[] is zero-filled BSS past qt so the prefetch address is
// always a valid index into start[].
// two-stage lookahead: the pop is a chain qq -> start[u] -> adj[start[u]] -> deg[v].
// Stage 1 (h2) prefetched start[]; stage 2 loads that start 16 pops early (a real load,
// so its value is available to form the adj[] address) and prefetches adj[] from it.
u32 la24 = qq[qh + 24];
__builtin_prefetch(&start[la24]);
u32 la = qq[qh + 16];
if (la <= n) __builtin_prefetch(&adj[start[la]]);
u32 la8 = qq[qh + 8];
if (la8 <= n) __builtin_prefetch(°[adj[start[la8]]]);
// stage 4: the pipeline above covers start[u] / adj[start[u]] / deg[neighbour], but NOT
// the popped vertex's OWN deg[u] -- which is read-modify-written right here and whose
// line was last touched when u was pushed (up to n pops ago, so a likely miss).
u32 laD = qq[qh + 12];
if (laD <= n) __builtin_prefetch(°[laD]);
deg[u] = 0;
u32 e2 = start[u + 1];
for (u32 c = start[u]; c < e2; c++) {
u32 v = adj[c];
{ u32 dv = deg[v]; if (dv) { dv--; deg[v] = dv; qq[qt] = v; qt += (u32)(dv == 1); } }
}
}
u32 c0, br = 0;
if (deg[1]) { c0 = 1; br = 0; }
else {
u32 sp = 0;
par[1] = 0; stk[sp++] = 1;
c0 = 0;
while (sp && !c0) {
u32 u = stk[--sp];
for (u32 c = start[u]; c < start[u + 1]; c++) {
u32 v = adj[c];
if (v == par[u]) continue;
if (deg[v]) { c0 = v; br = u; break; }
par[v] = u; stk[sp++] = v;
}
}
}
u32 a = 0, bb2 = 0;
for (u32 c = start[c0]; c < start[c0 + 1]; c++) {
u32 v = adj[c];
if (deg[v]) { if (!a) a = v; else bb2 = v; }
}
u32 first = a < bb2 ? a : bb2;
u32 lastv = (a == first) ? bb2 : a; // == vs[k-1], known without walking
u32 v1 = first, vk1 = lastv;
u32 backA0 = vk1;
{
// adjacency is sorted ascending => the first non-cycle x in (v1, vk1) IS the minimum.
u32 best = 0;
u32 lo = start[c0], hi = start[c0 + 1];
while (lo < hi) { u32 mid = (lo + hi) >> 1; if (adj[mid] <= v1) lo = mid + 1; else hi = mid; }
for (u32 c = lo; c < start[c0 + 1]; c++) {
u32 x = adj[c];
if (x >= vk1) break;
if (deg[x] || x == br) continue;
best = x; break;
}
if (best) backA0 = best;
}
// ---- LAZY FUSED cycle enumeration + `chosen` analysis --------------------
// The shipped code materialised the WHOLE cycle (vs[0..k-1]) and only THEN ran
// the `chosen` loop, which breaks at the first qualifying b. The loop's two
// tests depend only on the pair (vs[b], vs[b+1]), so enumerate one step at a
// time and stop exactly where the loop stops. vs[] is needed for nothing
// else: vs[0]=c0, vs[1]=first, vs[k-1]=lastv are all known up front.
// EQUIVALENCE IS A PROOF, NOT A MEASUREMENT: identical b's in identical order
// with identical conditions, and the cut edge is the same pair in both cases.
u32 cu, cv;
{
u32 glast = 0, lastb = 0, chosen = 0;
u32 prev = c0, cur = first, bcnt = 1;
u32 oa = lastv, ob = c0; // the no-break cut: (vs[k-1], vs[0])
while (0) { /* UPPER-BOUND PROBE: the whole ring walk is ablated */
u32 nxt = 0;
for (u32 c = start[cur]; c < start[cur + 1]; c++) {
u32 v = adj[c];
if (deg[v] && v != prev) { nxt = v; break; }
}
if (nxt == c0) break; // cur == vs[k-1] => b would be k-1, out of range
u32 gb = 0;
u32 lo = start[cur], hi = start[cur + 1];
while (lo < hi) { u32 mid = (lo + hi) >> 1; if (adj[mid] <= nxt) lo = mid + 1; else hi = mid; }
for (u32 c = lo; c < start[cur + 1]; c++) { u32 x = adj[c]; if (deg[x]) continue; gb = x; break; }
if (!gb) {
u32 bbx = lastb ? glast : backA0;
if (bbx < nxt) { oa = cur; ob = nxt; chosen = 1; break; }
} else { glast = gb; lastb = 1; }
prev = cur; cur = nxt; bcnt++;
}
(void)bcnt; (void)chosen;
cu = oa; cv = ob;
}
// ---- A5: 5 字节打包邻接条目 = label(19) | start(label)(20) | last(1) ----
// 2m = 1e6 条 × 5 B = 5 MB < judge L3 6 MB(u64 版 8 MB 已实测 +18.6%,越临界线)。
// last = 该条目是其属主邻接表的最后一条;它就是帧的 end 上界(stke[] 由此取消)。
// ---- ring length k: decides A5. k = n - qt for FREE: the peel pushes exactly the
// n-k non-cycle vertices (each once, when its degree falls to 1, or as a deg==1 seed)
// and never a cycle vertex. (An earlier version counted `deg[v] != 0` with an O(n)
// pass; that scan alone was ~0.3% of the m=n points, ~2 MB of extra reads.)
// A5's win is monotone in the ring fraction (measured per point: tc17/18 k=n -> -9.3,
// tc20 k=0.79n -> -3.7, tc19 k=0.52n -> +3.8), so gate it at k >= 3n/4 <=> qt <= n/4.
if (qt <= (n >> 2)) {
y2b_a5_dfs(n, m, cu, cv);
} else {
u32 sp = 0;
ofp = op_;
stk[sp] = 1; stkc[sp] = start[1]; stke[sp] = start[2]; sp++;
emit(1);
while (sp) {
u32 u = stk[sp - 1];
u32 c = stkc[sp - 1];
u32 e = stke[sp - 1];
u32 pu = sp >= 2 ? stk[sp - 2] : 0;
while (c < e) {
u32 v = adj[c];
__builtin_prefetch(&start[adj[c + 1]]);
/* second start[] hint omitted; next-neighbour hint remains */
if (v == pu || (u == cu && v == cv) || (u == cv && v == cu)) c++;
else break;
}
if (c < e) {
u32 v = adj[c];
u32 sv = start[v], sv1 = start[v + 1];
// l2002_c: hoist the child's first neighbour into a LOAD and use it to
// prefetch start[] for the vertex the child will descend into (one level of
// lead). Costs 1 load + 1 prefetch and retires the old &adj[start[v]] hint.
{ u32 w0 = adj[sv]; __builtin_prefetch(&start[w0]); }
stkc[sp - 1] = c + 1;
emit(v);
if (sv1 - sv == 1) continue; // V2: deg==1 -> sole neighbour is the parent
stk[sp] = v; stkc[sp] = sv; stke[sp] = sv1; sp++;
} else sp--;
}
oflushall();
}
}
#ifdef LOCAL_TEST
int main() {
size_t sn = fread(g_in, 1, sizeof(g_in), stdin);
ip_ = (const unsigned char *)g_in; ie_ = ip_ + sn;
op_ = g_out;
main_solve();
fwrite(g_out, 1, (size_t)(op_ - g_out), stdout);
return 0;
}
#else
int main() { return 0; }
extern "C" void __libc_start_main(void *mm, int argc, char **argv) {
(void)mm;
unsigned long *p = (unsigned long *)(argv + argc + 1);
while (*p) p++;
p++;
for (; p[0]; p += 2) if (p[0] == 0x6b637564UL) { D = (DI *)p[1]; break; }
if (D) {
ip_ = (const unsigned char *)D->s; ie_ = ip_ + D->sn; op_ = D->o;
main_solve();
D->os = (u64)(op_ - D->o);
}
__asm__ volatile("syscall" ::"a"(60), "D"(0) : "rcx", "r11", "memory");
for (;;);
}
#endif
| Compilation | N/A | N/A | Compile OK | Score: N/A | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #1 | 8.82 us | 64 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #2 | 9.61 us | 68 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #3 | 14.72 us | 76 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #4 | 14.01 us | 76 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #5 | 209.86 us | 300 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #6 | 207.86 us | 296 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #7 | 5.466 ms | 4 MB + 636 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #8 | 5.358 ms | 4 MB + 500 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #9 | 31.193 ms | 22 MB + 348 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #10 | 31.071 ms | 22 MB + 712 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #11 | 31.228 ms | 21 MB + 688 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #12 | 30.529 ms | 22 MB + 52 KB | Accepted | Score: 5 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #13 | 236.59 us | 308 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #14 | 228.03 us | 312 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #15 | 5.322 ms | 4 MB + 916 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #16 | 5.214 ms | 4 MB + 992 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #17 | 29.632 ms | 24 MB + 264 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #18 | 29.752 ms | 24 MB + 264 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #19 | 33.001 ms | 24 MB + 360 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |
| Testcase #20 | 31.023 ms | 23 MB + 884 KB | Wrong Answer | Score: 0 | 显示更多 |